A completed PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2 source evaluation exercise, with several sources on one question located, sorted by type and credibility, and cited in APA form. Searches like "psyc fpx 2002 assessment 2 assignment example", "psycfpx2002 assessment 2 sample" and "psyc-fpx2002 assessment 2 example" land here.
What a finished PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2 source evaluation exercise looks like
What lands on the page is closer to a worked exercise than an essay. Each source gets an entry: the full APA reference, a sentence on what kind of document it is, a sentence on who produced it and for whom, and a judgment about what it can be used to support. The empirical article is described by its method, the review by what it synthesized, the magazine feature by the study it is reporting on secondhand. Database work shows through in the entries, since the sources were located through library search rather than a general web search, and the record of that search appears where the instructions ask for it. Formatting is exact down to the italics, because the same criterion that praises evaluation also grades the reference itself.
How a PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2 example is structured
The example is organized around one question rather than around a pile of sources, which is what keeps the evaluations comparable. It opens by stating the psychological question the sources are supposed to address, narrow enough that a source either speaks to it or does not. A short methods note records where the search happened and which terms were used, since several sections grade that directly. The body then takes the sources in order of evidentiary weight, empirical article first, then review or textbook treatment, then professional or popular material, and each entry answers the same four questions in the same order so a reader can compare across them. A comparison paragraph follows, saying which source would be cited for which kind of claim and why the popular one cannot carry a finding. The closing states what the set as a whole can support, and what it cannot.
One question, several kinds of source
The exercise fixes a narrow psychological question first, so each source can be judged on whether it actually addresses that question at all.
Document type identified before credibility
Each entry says what the item is, an empirical report, a review, a trade piece, since type determines what kind of claim it can support.
The study told apart from coverage of it
A news feature and the article it describes are entered separately, which is the distinction this exercise exists to test and students most often miss.
APA references built, not approximated
Every reference is formatted to the current edition, including capitalization and italics, because the mechanics here are graded rather than treated as decoration.
Search process shown where required
Databases, search terms and limiters appear in the document when the instructions ask for them, since several sections grade the search as a skill.
Where marks go in PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2
Source trouble in the course about sources is the expensive irony here, and it shows up first as a blog or a content site entered as research. Second is the abstract mistaken for the article, an evaluation written about a paper the writer never opened past the summary, which becomes obvious the moment the method is described in general terms. Third is APA form treated as approximate, with capitalization, italics and author initials done by eye, in an exercise where a criterion is watching those exact features. Marks also go for evaluations that describe a source without judging it, for credibility asserted through the publisher's reputation alone, for sources that do not address the stated question, and for a required search record left out. Stronger versions say what each source can and cannot be cited for.
Get a PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2 example written to your instructions
Attach the Assessment 2 instructions and scoring guide from your PSYC-FPX2002 section, plus the topic or question your sources are supposed to address. A matched example arrives inside 24-48h with the entries and references built the way your criteria describe, and the first custom sample is free of charge.
PSYC-FPX2002 Assessment 2 questions, answered
How do I tell a peer-reviewed article from a summary of one?
Look at what the document does. An empirical article reports its own method, participants and results, and carries sections with those names; a summary reports someone else's findings and often names the journal it read. Database limiters help, though they are not infallible, and the surest check is opening the document and asking whether anyone in it collected data.
Do popular sources belong in the exercise at all?
Often yes, as specimens rather than as evidence. Many sections deliberately ask for a mix so you can show what distinguishes the tiers, and a magazine feature evaluated accurately demonstrates more literacy than a fourth journal article would. What loses marks is treating that feature as support for a psychological claim later in the document.
Which APA edition should the references follow?
The one your courseroom names, which is stated in the assignment materials or the writing resources your section links. Editions differ in small ways that a criterion can see, particularly around DOIs, publisher location and running heads. Build the references by hand against the current manual rather than trusting a citation generator, since generators reproduce old formats without warning.