This page holds a finished PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1 schedule network diagram with sequenced activities, stated durations, calculated float and a critical path the numbers support. Searches like "pm fpx 4030 assessment 1 assignment example", "pmfpx4030 assessment 1 sample" and "pm-fpx4030 assessment 1 example" land here.
What a finished PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1 schedule network diagram looks like
The finished example carries a table and a diagram that agree with each other. The table lists every activity with an identifier, a duration, its predecessors and the relationship type, so a reader can rebuild the network without the picture. The diagram then draws the same activities as nodes with arrows for the dependencies, each node showing early start, early finish, late start, late finish and total float. The critical path is highlighted, and its length equals the project duration stated in the text, because those two numbers are the first thing a reader checks. Lags and leads, if used, are labeled where they occur. A short passage explains the near-critical path, since a chain with one day of float is a real risk.
How a PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1 example is structured
The example works in the order the calculation demands. The activity list comes first, drawn from the work packages rather than invented, so every activity traces back to something the scope promised. Dependencies follow, and each one carries a reason, since a predecessor with no justification is a guess that will not hold when the schedule is questioned. Durations arrive next with the estimating basis named for each group. The network is then drawn, and the forward pass produces early dates while the backward pass produces late dates, with the results shown rather than summarized. Float is computed per activity, and the zero-float chain is identified as the critical path. The final section states the project duration, the paths within a few days of critical, and what would happen to the end date if one critical activity slipped.
Activities traced to work packages
Every activity comes from something the breakdown structure already promised, so the schedule covers the project instead of a parallel list of tasks.
Dependencies given with reasons
Each predecessor relationship states why the second activity cannot start earlier, which distinguishes a real constraint from a habit of listing work in order.
Forward and backward passes shown
Early and late dates appear on the nodes rather than in a conclusion, because a criterion checking the calculation needs the working visible.
Critical path derived, not chosen
The zero-float chain emerges from the float column, and its total length matches the project duration quoted everywhere else in the document.
Near-critical chains flagged too
Paths with only a day or two of float are named as risks, since they become critical the moment anything on them slips.
Where marks go in PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1
This is one of the few deliverables in the program where an answer can be simply wrong. A forward pass that miscarries at one node moves every date after it, and a critical path that does not equal the stated project duration is caught in seconds. Float computed by eye rather than from late minus early dates produces the same failure. The second category is structural: activities with no predecessors and no successors dangling off the network, or a diagram whose arrows contradict the dependency table. Missing durations, unstated estimating bases and undefined lags cost credit on the supporting criteria. Distinguished versions show the arithmetic, reconcile the diagram against the table, and say what a slip on one critical activity does to the finish date.
Get a PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Assessment 1 instructions and the scoring guide from your PM-FPX4030 courseroom, plus the activity list or case data your section provides. We write a custom example to those criteria, with the passes calculated and the diagram reconciled against the table, and return it in 24 to 48 hours. The first custom sample is free.
PM-FPX4030 Assessment 1 questions, answered
Do I have to draw the diagram by hand?
Check your instructions, since some sections accept scheduling software output and others want a drawn network. Either way the node values have to be present and correct. Software that hides the early and late dates makes the calculation criterion harder to satisfy, so export a view that shows them or add a table with the same figures alongside.
What if my critical path has two chains of equal length?
That is a legitimate result and worth saying out loud. Two parallel chains at zero float means two paths can each delay the project, which doubles the number of activities the manager has to watch. State both, mark both on the diagram, and note the management consequence rather than picking one and hoping nobody checks the other.
Where do the durations come from if this is a made-up project?
From a stated estimating basis you apply consistently. Analogous reasoning from similar work, a parametric rate per unit, or a three-point estimate all give you defensible numbers, and naming which one you used satisfies the supporting criterion. Numbers that appear without any basis are the weakest part of most submissions, even when the arithmetic on them is flawless.